Flight Path Comparison
v2.0
Compare globe route distances with a flat-earth map distance model on the same city pair.
Cross-content topic · 24 matches
This page groups tools, debunks, and experiments that connect to the tag “Navigation”.
Interactive models, calculators, and simulations connected to “Navigation”.
v2.0
Compare globe route distances with a flat-earth map distance model on the same city pair.
v1.0
Compare local-level flight on a curved Earth with the misconception of chasing one fixed departure tangent across a long route.
v2.0
Measure how the flat-earth disc stretches east-west distances at southern latitudes.
v1.0
Predict satellite rise, peak, set, and visibility from current TLEs, observer coordinates, and a time window.
v1.1
Replay ISS and geostationary passes on a live globe ground track with horizon elevation and pass scrubber.
v2.0
Compute orbital period, ground speed, and horizon slant range from altitude, then see why TLE plus SGP4 pass tables repeat.
v2.0
Show how navigation satellites use timing and line-of-sight geometry to determine position.
v1.2
Connect a USB/serial GPS receiver in the browser and inspect live NMEA data such as fix quality, satellites, DOP, speed, and coordinates.
Claim-by-claim responses tied to the same topic and underlying theory.
v1.0
Real airline routes only make sense on a flat-earth map, especially in the southern hemisphere.
v1.0
Satellites are fake, and communication or tracking systems are really just balloons, towers, or fabricated stories.
v1.0
Antarctica is not a continent around the south pole. It is an ice wall around the edge of a flat Earth.
v1.0
Time zones are just man-made schedules, so they do not prove a rotating globe.
v1.1
A compass points north on a flat map, so that must mean the Earth is a plane centered on the north pole.
v1.0
Any map has distortion, so the distortion problems in the flat-earth map are not a real objection.
v1.5
GPS and GNSS are really just ground towers or fake software, so they do not prove anything about satellites or a globe.
v1.0
Home dishes point too low above the horizon, so they must be aiming at nearby towers instead of satellites.
v1.0
Predicted satellite passes do not prove orbiting objects because balloons could explain moving lights too.
Repeatable observations you can use to test the same topic directly.
v1.1
Can you capture a satellite radio downlink with a receive-only SDR at the predicted pass time, frequency, and sky direction the way orbital geometry predicts?
v1.0
Does GNSS accuracy degrade when the sky view is restricted, as a satellite-based system predicts?
v1.1
Do month-ahead astronomy calendars predict real sky events correctly when they are filtered for your location, local time, and hemisphere?