- phone or GNSS receiver
- open-sky outdoor area
- location with partial sky blockage such as near tall buildings, under a roof edge, or beside a high wall
- notes or screenshots
- optional GNSS app or status page that shows satellite count, reported accuracy, and fix stability
Experiment
GNSS Sky Block Experiment
Does GNSS accuracy degrade when the sky view is restricted, as a satellite-based system predicts?
Materials Needed
Setup Steps
- Stand in an open area with a wide view of the sky and let the receiver stabilize.
- Record the reported accuracy, visible satellite count if available, position stability, and time-to-fix or convergence time.
- Move to a place with a blocked view of the sky and record the same values again after waiting for the receiver to settle.
- If possible, repeat the comparison more than once and keep the same device, app, and observation duration for both locations.
Expected Calculation
A receiver with fewer visible satellites and worse sky geometry should have a weaker fix, slower convergence, and larger position uncertainty. Multipath reflections near walls or overhangs can make the degraded result even more obvious.
Graphic
This visual shows the core geometry the experiment is testing before the real-world observation is made.
What to Observe
- Open sky usually gives a faster fix, tighter reported accuracy, and a steadier position.
- Obstructed sky often produces slower convergence, a larger uncertainty circle, more position jumping, or fewer reported satellites.
- The effect depends on how much of the overhead satellite view is blocked and how much reflected signal contamination is introduced nearby.
- If your receiver or app exposes satellite count or DOP-style quality values, those should usually look worse in the blocked-sky position.
Interpretation
That pattern fits a satellite-based ranging system that needs multiple lines of sight across the sky, not a simple local-tower story. By itself this is still an observational field test rather than a full proof, so the cleanest approach is to repeat it carefully and compare multiple runs.
Sources
Evidence Card
Claim
Does GNSS accuracy degrade when the sky view is restricted, as a satellite-based system predicts?
Model Used
The experiment’s stated geometry or physical model with fixed inputs across comparisons.
Formula
Last Verified
2026-06-30
Assumptions
- The protocol holds location, height, and distance inputs fixed while comparing observation to prediction.
- A single ambiguous photo is not enough; repeatable measurements matter.
- Primary-source references carry more weight than generic summaries.
External Sources
A page-specific source set has not been attached yet.
What Would Falsify This Page
A repeatable observation that matched the competing model better than this experiment’s stated prediction would count against this page.